A California judge was sentenced to life imprisonment on Wednesday, December 8, individually considering whether Scott Peterson would be sentenced to a new trial for killing his pregnant wife and fetal son in 2002. He said he would be outraged. After spending more than 15 years on death row, the California Supreme Court overturned his conviction last year, saying prosecutors would never ask him to be sentenced to death. “This is no longer a death sentence,” Stanislaus County Prosecutor Birgit Hradagar reiterated in a short hearing Wednesday, saying “it is the only way to live without life imprisonment.” She expects life imprisonment within two hours in a short statement from her 27-year-old family. -Old Rashi Peterson Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time of the murder, attended a hearing via a remote link from San Quentin State Prison, home to California’s death row prison, but Will High Court last year. The jury, who personally disagreed with the death penalty but were prepared to impose it, ruled that he had been improperly fired. A brand new trial due to the illegal activities of the jury. This complicated who was to represent him and the timing of the retrial. Defendant attorneys who work for Habeas Corpus attorneys may not be able to represent Peterson because the law only allows them to be involved in the death penalty. Pat Harris, one of Peterson’s attorneys, told Masullo that removing those attorneys could mean delaying the decision to retry, âIt can take a considerable amount of time. .. It may take over a year for the new lawyer to be up to date. Harris instead suggested a new trial in mid-November, ahead of Peterson’s retrial date. Massaro will consider when and who will represent Peterson at a hearing later this month. A woman known as Judge 7 is in the screening process when she tries to join the jury. She then co-wrote a book on the case. A Supreme Court judge said Peterson committed one and two murders of his wife, whom he planned to name Connor. He said there was considerable circumstantial evidence accusing Peterson of the case. He transported the body to Modesto’s house on Christmas Eve in 2002 and dumped it from his fishing boat in San Francisco Bay. Investigators say they have been excluded as suspects, although there is new evidence that they may have committed a crime. Peterson’s lawyer has a chance to prove it. Must persuade Masullo’s jury. She was a victim of the crime and suffered prejudice because she did not disclose it during jury selection. Then, during her pregnancy in 2001, a woman It turned out that she was beaten by her boyfriend. She got a detention order against her boyfriend’s ex-girlfriend because she feared the woman would harm her fetus.
A California judge felt life imprisonment on Dec. 8 while individually considering whether Scott Peterson would face a new trial for the 2002 murder of his pregnant wife and fetal son on Wednesday. He said he intended to do so.
Peterson was sentenced to death in 2005 and sentenced to death for over 15 years, but the California Supreme Court overturned his sentence last year and prosecutors said he would never ask him to be sentenced to death . I am.
âIt’s no longer a death sentence. There is no other way but life imprisonment without parole, âStanislaus County Prosecutor Birgit Hradagar said in a brief hearing Wednesday.
She hopes an outrage hearing continues within two hours, with a brief statement from the family of Laci Peterson, 27, eight months pregnant at the time of the murder.
Peterson attended the hearing via remote link from San Quentin State Prison, the seat of death row prison in California, but will attend directly due to his resentment.
Last year, the High Court ruled that the jury, which was prepared to impose the death penalty, had been wrongly removed, although it personally disagreed with the death penalty.
He individually ordered High Court Judge Anne Christine Massullo to decide whether Peterson should go to a new trial due to the misconduct of the jury.
This complicated the choice of who should represent him and the decision to retry. Defendant attorneys who work for Habeas Corpus attorneys may not be able to represent Peterson because the law only allows them to be involved in the death penalty.
Pat Harris, one of Peterson’s attorneys, told Massullo that firing those attorneys could mean delaying the decision to retry. This obviously raises great concerns for us. “
Instead, Harris offered a rehearsal in mid-November, ahead of Peterson’s rehearsal date.
Massullo will consider the timing and who will represent Peterson at a hearing later this month.
Peterson’s attorney claims that a woman known as Jury 7 mistakenly answered a question during the selection process when she attempted to join the jury. She then co-wrote a book on the case.
A Supreme Court judge said there was plenty of circumstantial evidence to blame Peterson for the first and second murders of his wife, whom Peterson had planned to name Connor.
Prosecutors said Peterson brought his wife’s body back from the Modesto house on Christmas Eve in 2002 and abandoned her from his fishing boat in San Francisco Bay. The body was washed ashore in April 2003.
Lawyers say there is new evidence nearby thieves may have committed the crime, but investigators say they have been ruled out as suspects.
To have the opportunity to prove it, Peterson’s lawyer must convince Masullo that the jury is prejudiced because he was the victim of a crime.
Later it turned out that he was beaten up by her boyfriend during her pregnancy in 2001. He also did not reveal that he was ordered to detain the ex-girlfriend of her boyfriend because he was afraid of harming the woman during another pregnancy. Its foetation.
Judge sets new conviction date in December and separately considers retrial Judge sets new conviction date in December and separately considers retrial